home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT1022>
- <title>
- Apr. 23, 1990: Earth Day:Will The Ballyhoo Go Bust?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Apr. 23, 1990 Dan Quayle:No Joke
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ENVIRONMENT, Page 86
- EARTH DAY
- Will the Ballyhoo Go Bust?
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Eugene Linden
- </p>
- <p> As the marketing monster called Earth Day lumbers toward
- April 22, hapless journalists in its path are desperately
- dodging a barrage of press kits, news releases and alerts.
- Thousands of Earth Day happenings, from ladybug releases and the
- building of garbage monuments to corporate "We love the
- environment too" advertising campaigns, have become an
- undifferentiated blur as everyone tries to wave the green flag
- at once. Nobody is against Earth Day, but the very breadth of
- this looming mega-event raises the question: What's the point?
- </p>
- <p> Certainly demonstrations and mass events have an honored
- role in history. Sheer, chanting force of numbers has served
- notice to dictators from Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines to
- Nicolae Ceausescu in Romania that their time was up. Back in
- 1970, activists capitalized on an outpouring of environmental
- sentiment during the first Earth Day to unseat seven of a
- targeted "dirty dozen" politicians and spur the passage of
- clean-air-and-water legislation. Today Eastern Europe, perhaps
- the grimiest industrial region on earth, could use Earth Day to
- focus newly aroused democratic forces on their poisoned air and
- land. So could much of the Third World, where billions of
- people grievously stretch the capacity of forests and other
- resources.
- </p>
- <p> In the U.S., though, Earth Day 1990 comes at a time when
- environment is a motherhood issue. Since polls show that
- Americans want environmental protection regardless of costs, the
- problem is not so much awakening the nation to ecological
- threats as it is getting people to face the difficult choices
- entailed in dealing with those threats. For a number of reasons,
- Earth Day might actually thwart that end.
- </p>
- <p> Mass events are crude instruments, useful for delivering
- slogans and chants but not well suited to deciding subtle issues
- that confront environmental converts who are trying to translate
- their concerns into practice. Whether people should buy
- biodegradable or recyclable plastics or switch from disposable
- to cloth diapers will not be settled on April 22.
- </p>
- <p> Earth Day fits into a troubling American pattern of
- responding to crises with rhetoric and theater. So far, it has
- been easy to be an environmentalist: one simply has to claim to
- be one. Just as middle-class voters routinely condemn "welfare"
- while opposing cuts in the social programs that constitute such
- spending, a good portion of the voters who claim they would pay
- for environmental improvements balk when the bill is presented.
- If consumers truly insisted on cleaner air in their individual
- buying and voting decisions, Detroit and Japan would vie to
- deliver less polluting cars, and it would not take ten years of
- struggle to amend the Clean Air Act.
- </p>
- <p> Instead of making hard choices, it is easier to blow off
- steam. April 22 will offer people an opportunity to purge
- accumulated anxiety over wounds to earth's life-support systems.
- Worn out by weeks of buildup and an accompanying media blitz,
- many people will return to business as usual on Monday, hoping
- not to hear the E word again for weeks. It is possible that the
- environment might be better served if consumers had no such
- outlet, and were forced to do some quiet soul searching about
- how their individual choices contribute to the world's
- environmental problems.
- </p>
- <p> In the past, raucous demonstrations have sometimes polarized
- the nation, shifting attention from the issues to the rowdy
- behavior and unpopular politics--Stalinists for Solidarity
- with the Viet Cong!--of protesters. Since support for
- environmental protection spans the political spectrum,
- polarization should not plague Earth Day unless fringe groups
- seize the occasion to sabotage a steel mill or stage other
- "ecotage" attacks on perceived corporate villains. Earth Day's
- organizers more likely face the opposite problem: the
- possibility that the hype and the numbing array of events will
- cause people to throw up their hands and stay home.
- </p>
- <p> Proponents argue that Earth Day 1990 will both challenge
- individuals and mobilize new constituencies such as minorities,
- the religious community and organized labor. The event's
- disciplined chairman and mastermind, San Francisco lawyer Denis
- Hayes, hopes to saturate the public consciousness and create
- what he calls a "tilt point" in attitudes, refocusing the
- passions of the cold war on ecological issues. Hayes hopes that
- Earth Day will help make sound environmental behavior as
- accepted in daily life as wearing a seat belt. Democratic
- Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts believes Earth Day will help
- recruit an army of voters to hold slippery politicians truly
- accountable for environmental problems in coming elections.
- </p>
- <p> This will be no easy task. One of America's more dubious
- achievements during the past two decades is the perfecting of
- techniques that enable politicians and corporations to
- capitalize on discontents without threatening the status quo.
- Unlike the world's oppressed, Americans have many ways of
- expressing their frustrations through votes, opinion surveys and
- boycotts, as well as demonstrations. Legislators and companies
- have fine-tuned their ability to respond to expressions of
- public anxiety with promises of legislative and private
- initiatives, reassuring people that problems are being
- addressed, if not solved. When things don't change for the
- better, people take to the streets again, and the cycle repeats
- itself, as it has with Earth Day 1990.
- </p>
- <p> The net effect of this intricate dance is that most
- environmental problems in the U.S. are more pressing today than
- they were 20 years ago. Insults to air, water and living things
- can no longer be dismissed as life-style and recreational issues
- for the middle class, but now must be seen as economic, social
- and even geopolitical crises. The question is whether the
- environment will allow the U.S. the luxury of Earth Day 2010.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-